The case of the US vs Bradley Manning
Why have the US media shied away from covering the source of the WikiLeaks material yet gouged on his information?
Our feature takes us to Ethiopia where the US ‘war on terror’ has provided cover for laws that are being used to silence dissident journalists. Reeyot Alemu is one of those journalists – she has been sentenced to five years in jail. Foreign reporters have also been charged under anti-terrorism laws for daring to communicate with opposition groups. The Listening Post’s Nic Muirhead takes a closer look.
US Private Bradley Manning is no longer the alleged source of all those documents to WikiLeaks. According to his own testimony, delivered before a military court on February 28, Manning was the source – nothing alleged about it.
In
a pre-trial hearing for the first time, Manning admitted that he broke
the law when he released around 700,000 government documents to
WikiLeaks but these lesser charges did not satisfy the United States
government.
Calling more than 100 witnesses – some anonymously and
in closed hearings – prosecutors will argue that Manning’s leak put
national security and lives at risk by ‘aiding the enemy’.
If convicted, Manning – the traitor, could face life without parole but what of Manning – the whistleblower?
During
his hour-long plea, Manning told the court that he first turned to the
national press. Before approaching WikiLeaks, Manning says he contacted
the New York Times, the Washington Post and Politico – neither of which
returned his calls. His testimony raises the question of whether the
mainstream press was prepared to host the debate on US interventions and
foreign policy that Manning had in mind.
Media outlets went on to
draw on WikiLeaks for some of the biggest news stories of the decade.
Manning’s leak meant millions of papers sold and pages viewed yet the
story of the man himself has been pushed to the margins. Is this just
ingratitude or something more sinister? Are important parts of the
fourth estate signing up for a system of government-media relations that
sees whistleblowers as enemies of the state?
To discuss Manning’s
testimony and the implications for journalism and freedom of speech our
News Divide guests this week are: Chase Madar, author of ‘The Passion
of Bradley Manning’; Jesselyn Radack, whistleblower and activist; Ed
Pilkington, a reporter for the Guardian; and Janet Reitman, a Rolling
Stone columnist.
In NewsBytes this week: Two more journalists
gunned down in Pakistan; the Somalian journalist on trial for reporting
on rape gets six months in jail; Myanmar’s hopeful media opening under
threat; and the French government in a flap over coverage of the war in
Mali.
Our feature takes us to Ethiopia where the US ‘war on
terror’ has provided cover for laws that are being used to silence
dissident journalists. Reeyot Alemu is one of those journalists – she
has been sentenced to five years in jail. Foreign reporters have also
been charged under anti-terrorism laws for daring to communicate with
opposition groups. The Listening Post’s Nic Muirhead takes a closer
look.
We close with a musical take on the WikiLeaks story from a
region that has been a better friend to Julian Assange than some other
parts of the world. Perhaps Assange is tapping his toes to ‘El Son de los WikiLeaks’ while counting the days in the Ecuadorian embassy.
No comments:
Post a Comment